Affiliate disclosure: this provider is likely to operate an affiliate program; we hold no confirmed relationship with it and receive nothing if you subscribe. Other links on this page may be affiliate links, handled per our disclosure policy. Scores are set only by our published testing methodology.
- Platform
- Telegram
- Focus
- Bitcoin and Ethereum calls
- Pricing (July 2026)
- £42/mo
- Refund policy
- 30-day money-back guarantee
- Claimed win rate
- 75–90% — self-reported range
- Independently tracked
- Could not verify — no third-party count exists
- Audience
- 60,000+ subscribers
- Affiliate program
- Likely, not confirmed
- Risk level
- Moderate — unaudited claims, refund offsets some of it
A middle-of-the-road paid channel with one genuinely above-average feature: it will give your money back inside 30 days. That's a real, testable commitment in a niche built on unrefundable crypto payments, and it drags the score up on its own. The claimed 75-90% accuracy does the opposite — a fifteen-point range is the sound of a number that was never counted properly. Subscribe if you're going to actually run the audit below. Don't subscribe to "give it a try".
What CryptoSignals.org is
CryptoSignals.org runs a Telegram-based paid signal service with more than 60,000 subscribers, concentrating on Bitcoin and Ethereum rather than chasing whatever altcoin is moving that week. Access costs £42 a month, and the subscription carries a 30-day money-back guarantee.
The name causes confusion worth clearing up: it has nothing to do with this site. We're CryptoSignals.Guide, we review providers and don't sell signals; they're a provider we review. If you landed here looking for their channel, that's the distinction.
Pricing and the refund window
| Item | Detail (July 2026) |
|---|---|
| Monthly subscription | £42 |
| Refund policy | 30 days, money back |
| Longer plans | Not disclosed in our research |
| Effective risk in month one | £0 if the refund is honoured |
£42 is unremarkable — squarely mid-market, well under the $240-plus that premium rooms charge. The refund is the interesting part. Most of this industry takes payment in crypto precisely because crypto payments can't be reversed; a chargeback-proof business model is a feature for the seller and a trap for the buyer. Offering a 30-day money-back window inverts that. It's the closest thing to skin in the game a signal provider can show without publishing a trade log.
Two caveats, stated plainly. First, a refund policy is only as good as its execution, and we have not tested this one, so treat it as a stated term rather than a verified outcome — keep every receipt and screenshot the policy page on the day you pay. Second, pricing in pounds means US subscribers eat currency conversion plus, on many cards, a foreign-transaction fee. Budget a few percent above the headline.
How to use 30 days as a free audit
Here's the part worth the click. A refund window is not a free month of trading — it's a free month of evidence collection. Run it like this:
- Log every call within a minute of arrival. Timestamp, pair, direction, entry zone, stop, all targets. If a signal is edited afterwards, note both versions — quiet edits are the oldest trick in the category.
- Record the price you could actually have filled at, not the one printed in the message. The gap between those two numbers is your real-world cost, and it's invisible in every marketing claim ever published.
- Paper-trade the whole month. No capital at risk while you're still deciding. You're measuring the provider, not making money yet.
- Count closed trades only, and count the losers. Open positions "still running" are the standard way an 80% record gets manufactured — the losses simply never close.
- Include fees and funding. A 1.1% gross winner on a leveraged pair can be a scratch after costs.
- Decide on day 27, not day 31. Set a calendar reminder the day you subscribe. Refund windows are worth nothing to people who forget them, which is partly why they're offered.
At the end you'll have your own number instead of theirs — and the same log format works on any provider you test next. It's a stripped-down version of what our desk does; the full protocol is in our testing methodology.
The BTC/ETH focus
Restricting calls to Bitcoin and Ethereum is a defensible choice and an underrated one. Deep order books mean your fill lands close to the posted entry even in size, so the gap between advertised and achieved results narrows. It also removes the whole category of risk that comes with thin altcoins, where a "signal" and a coordinated pump can look identical from the outside — the pattern documented in our pump-and-dump exposé.
The cost is opportunity: when BTC and ETH range for three weeks, an honest BTC/ETH channel goes quiet, and subscribers who equate quiet with poor value churn. If you'd feel short-changed by a slow fortnight, this focus will annoy you. If you understand that not trading is a position, it's a plus.
The 75-90% claim, unpacked
The advertised accuracy is a 75-90% range, and the range is the tell. Anyone maintaining a proper trade log produces a single figure that updates as trades close. A fifteen-point band means either the number varies wildly by period — in which case the top of the range is cherry-picked — or nobody is counting consistently at all. Neither reading supports the 90%.
Nothing independent exists to check it against: no third-party count, no loss-inclusive public log, and consequently an unverified entry in our accuracy tracker. There are no claimed-versus-tracked bars on this page because there's no tracked column to draw. For context, the highest figure our desk has seen survive an independent count anywhere in this niche sits in the mid-80s — so the top of this range would be an industry record, announced by the record holder, with no scorekeeper present.
To be fair: 75% at the bottom of the band is plausible, and the provider isn't claiming the 96%-plus fantasies that get channels flagged in our scam hub. This is inflation, not fabrication. It's still your job to replace their range with your own number.
Who CryptoSignals.org suits
Reasonable fit: a trader who mostly works the majors, wants a second opinion on BTC and ETH setups at a mid-market price, and will genuinely run the 30-day log before deciding to stay. The refund makes that first month close to risk-free in cash terms.
Not for you if: you want altcoin coverage, you need a verified track record before paying anything at all, or you know you'll let the refund window lapse. Also skip it if you're brand new — read how to vet a signal provider and try the free channels first.
Where it's strong
- 30-day money-back guarantee — rare, and testable
- £42/mo sits comfortably mid-market
- BTC/ETH focus means deep liquidity and small slippage
- No thin-altcoin calls, so no pump-adjacent grey zone
- 60,000+ subscribers and a stable public presence
Where it isn't
- 75–90% is a self-reported range, not a counted figure
- No independent audit and no public loss-inclusive log
- Refund policy is stated but untested by us
- GBP pricing adds conversion and card fees for US buyers
- Longer-term plan pricing isn't disclosed
- Coverage goes quiet when the majors range
Alternatives worth comparing
- Fat Pig Signals — publishes a loss-inclusive record rather than a range, which is the standard this provider should be held to.
- Learn2Trade — the other big UK-flavoured signal brand, with its own trial mechanics worth comparing.
- WolfxSignals — a claimed win rate that mostly held up when an outside party counted it.
For the wider field, start at the best crypto signals ranking or the Telegram channels hub.
How we scored it: 6.2/10
Under our weightings, verified performance is worth the most and earns almost nothing here — the 75-90% band is unaudited and internally inconsistent. Transparency lands mid-table: the price and refund terms are public, the accuracy claim isn't documented. Pricing and value score well, and the refund adds directly to the risk-practices component, because a provider funding your exit is materially safer to try than one taking irreversible crypto payments. No manipulation signals, no fantasy percentages, no anonymous-operator red flags. Sum: 6.2 — competent, honest enough about money, unproven about trading.
CryptoSignals.org FAQ
What does CryptoSignals.org cost?
£42 a month as of July 2026, with a 30-day money-back guarantee. Paying in pounds from a US card usually adds conversion and foreign-transaction costs on top.
Is the 75-90% win rate believable?
The bottom of the range is; the top isn't. No independent count exists, and a fifteen-point band is what you get when trades aren't logged consistently. Build your own number during the refund period.
How do I use the refund window properly?
Log every call with a timestamp the moment it posts, note the price you could really have filled at, paper-trade the month, count only closed trades including losers, and make your decision by day 27 — with the reminder set on day one.
Which coins does it cover?
Bitcoin and Ethereum. Narrow, but the majors have the deepest books, so your fills land closest to the posted entries and slippage stays small.
Does a 60,000-subscriber channel mean the signals are good?
No — audience size measures marketing, and Telegram counts can be padded cheaply. Plenty of large channels have never produced a verifiable trade.
Is CryptoSignals.org a scam?
We saw nothing to suggest it. Prices are open, a refund is offered, and the calls stay in liquid majors rather than manipulable microcaps. It's unverified, which is a different problem — and the 30-day window is the cheapest way to solve it for yourself.
Crypto assets are volatile and largely unregulated. Signal services — including CryptoSignals.org — can and do post losing streaks, and a refund policy protects your subscription fee, never your trading capital. Never trade with money you cannot afford to lose, and never treat a paid subscription as a guarantee of profit.
We test crypto signal providers with real subscriptions and log every published call — entries, stops and targets — before scoring anyone. Read how we test →